Semi-Pelagianism

Semi-Pelagianism is a theological perspective that emerged in the early 5th century as a response to the more extreme views of both Pelagianism and Augustinianism regarding the nature of grace, free will, and human salvation. It occupies a middle ground between Pelagianism, which emphasized human free will and the ability to choose good without divine aid, and Augustinianism, which stressed the necessity of divine grace for any good action or salvation.

Historical Context of Semi-Pelagianism

Pelagianism and Augustinianism

Pelagianism, named after the British monk Pelagius, was a theological movement that arose in the late 4th and early 5th centuries. Pelagius taught that human beings were born morally neutral, without the stain of original sin, and that they had the inherent ability to choose good or evil. According to Pelagius, divine grace was helpful but not necessary for living a righteous life; human effort and free will were sufficient.

In contrast, Augustine of Hippo, a contemporary of Pelagius, strongly opposed this view. Augustine argued that due to original sin, humanity was utterly incapable of doing good or achieving salvation apart from God’s grace. For Augustine, grace was not merely an aid but an absolute necessity for any good action or salvation. Augustine’s views became the foundation of what is often called Augustinianism or the doctrine of original sin and predestination.

The Emergence of Semi-Pelagianism

Semi-Pelagianism emerged as a reaction to the perceived extremes of both Pelagianism and Augustinianism. While it rejected the Pelagian idea that humans could initiate their salvation without God’s grace, it also resisted Augustine’s strict view that grace was irresistible and that predestination was entirely dependent on God’s sovereign will.

Semi-Pelagianism is often associated with the monastic community of southern Gaul (modern-day France), particularly with figures like John Cassian (c. 360–435 AD), Vincent of Lérins (died c. 445 AD), and Faustus of Riez (c. 405–490 AD). These theologians advocated for a more synergistic view of salvation, where human free will and divine grace cooperate in the process of salvation.

Key Tenets of Semi-Pelagianism

  1. Human Initiative in Salvation: Semi-Pelagianism holds that the initiative in salvation begins with the human will. According to this view, individuals have the capacity to desire and seek God on their own, and once they make this initial move, God’s grace assists them in the process of conversion and sanctification.
  2. Synergism: Semi-Pelagianism promotes a synergistic approach to salvation, meaning that it involves cooperation between human free will and divine grace. While God’s grace is necessary for salvation, it is not sufficient without the active cooperation of the human will.
  3. Denial of Total Depravity: Semi-Pelagianism rejects the Augustinian doctrine of total depravity, which teaches that every aspect of human nature is corrupted by sin and that people are incapable of choosing good without divine intervention. Instead, Semi-Pelagianism asserts that while human nature is weakened by sin, it is not entirely corrupted, and people retain the ability to choose God.

The Council of Orange (529 AD)

The theological debates surrounding Pelagianism, Augustinianism, and Semi-Pelagianism culminated in the Council of Orange in 529 AD. This council was convened to address the controversy over grace and free will and to clarify the Church’s official stance.

The Council of Orange condemned both Pelagianism and Semi-Pelagianism. It affirmed the necessity of prevenient grace, which means that God’s grace must precede any human effort in salvation. The council also upheld the Augustinian view that grace is necessary for both the beginning of faith and for perseverance in it.

Canon 3 of the Council of Orange (529 AD):
“If anyone says that the grace of God can be conferred as a result of human petition, but that it is not grace itself which makes us pray to God, he contradicts the prophet Isaiah, or the Apostle Paul who says the same thing: ‘We do not know what we should pray for as we ought; but the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.'”

The canons of the Council of Orange became an important reference point in the Church’s rejection of Semi-Pelagianism and the affirmation of the necessity of divine grace in the process of salvation.

Theological Perspectives on Semi-Pelagianism

Semi-Pelagianism and Free Will

One of the central issues in the Semi-Pelagianism debate is the nature of human free will. Semi-Pelagianism emphasizes the role of human freedom in initiating the process of salvation. According to this view, while divine grace is necessary for salvation, human beings must first take the step toward God.

This perspective is in contrast to Augustinianism, which asserts that due to original sin, human free will is so corrupted that it is incapable of choosing God or doing good apart from divine intervention. Augustine taught that God’s grace is what enables the human will to turn toward God, making any human initiative dependent on grace.

John 6:44 (NIV):
“No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day.”

This verse is often cited by Augustinians to support the idea that human beings cannot come to God on their own but need to be drawn by the Father.

Grace and Human Cooperation

Semi-Pelagianism posits that once a person takes the initial step toward God, divine grace assists them in the process of conversion, sanctification, and perseverance. This view implies a cooperation between human effort and divine grace in the process of salvation.

In contrast, traditional Augustinian and later Reformed theology argue that grace is not merely cooperative but entirely the work of God. According to this view, God’s grace not only assists but also initiates and completes the work of salvation in the believer.

Philippians 2:12-13 (NIV):
“Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you to will and to act in order to fulfill his good purpose.”

This passage reflects the balance between human responsibility and divine action, but it emphasizes that it is ultimately God who works in believers to will and to act.

Original Sin and Human Nature

Semi-Pelagianism offers a more optimistic view of human nature than Augustinianism. While it acknowledges the effects of original sin, it denies that sin has entirely corrupted human free will. Instead, Semi-Pelagianism holds that humans, though weakened by sin, retain the ability to choose good and to seek God.

Augustinianism, on the other hand, teaches that original sin has rendered human beings spiritually dead and incapable of turning to God without the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit.

Romans 3:10-12 (NIV):
“As it is written: ‘There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God. All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one.'”

This passage is often used to support the Augustinian view of human depravity and the necessity of divine grace for salvation.

Practical Implications of Semi-Pelagianism

The Role of Prayer and Effort in Salvation

Semi-Pelagianism encourages a view of the Christian life in which human effort, prayer, and moral striving play a significant role in the process of salvation. This perspective emphasizes the believer’s responsibility to seek God and to cooperate with His grace.

However, this emphasis on human initiative and cooperation can sometimes lead to a legalistic or works-based approach to salvation, where the focus shifts from God’s grace to human effort. This is one reason why the Church has historically rejected Semi-Pelagianism in favor of a more grace-centered theology.

Assurance of Salvation

The Semi-Pelagian view can also affect a believer’s sense of assurance. If salvation is seen as dependent on human initiative and cooperation, it may lead to uncertainty about one’s standing before God. In contrast, a more Augustinian or Reformed understanding of grace provides assurance based on God’s sovereign work in the believer’s life, rather than on human effort.

Ephesians 2:8-9 (NIV):
“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.”

This passage emphasizes that salvation is entirely a gift of God’s grace, not something earned by human effort.

Broader Biblical Themes

The Sovereignty of God

The debate between Semi-Pelagianism and Augustinianism touches on the broader biblical theme of God’s sovereignty. The Bible consistently portrays God as the sovereign ruler of the universe, who accomplishes His purposes according to His will.

Isaiah 46:9-10 (NIV):
“Remember the former things, those of long ago; I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me. I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say, ‘My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please.'”

This passage supports the view that God’s will is the ultimate determiner of all things, including salvation.

Grace and Faith

The theme of grace is central to the New Testament, particularly in the writings of Paul. The tension between divine grace and human responsibility is a recurring theme in Scripture, with passages emphasizing both the necessity of grace and the call to respond in faith.

Romans 11:6 (NIV):
“And if by grace, then it cannot be based on works; if it were, grace would no longer be grace.”

This verse underscores the distinction between grace and works, a key issue in the debate over Semi-Pelagianism.

Legacy and Influence in Christian Doctrine

Impact on Catholic and Protestant Theology

The condemnation of Semi-Pelagianism at the Council of Orange had a significant impact on both Catholic and Protestant theology. The Catholic Church adopted a view that emphasizes the necessity of grace while allowing for human cooperation, a position that avoids the extremes of both Pelagianism and Augustinianism.

In Protestantism, particularly in Reformed and Lutheran traditions, there is a strong emphasis on the sovereignty of grace and the necessity of God’s initiative in salvation. These traditions reject Semi-Pelagianism as compromising the doctrine of salvation by grace alone.

Modern Theological Discussions

In modern theological discussions, Semi-Pelagianism continues to be a relevant topic, particularly in debates over the nature of free will, grace, and predestination. While the term “Semi-Pelagianism” is often used pejoratively, the issues it raises about the relationship between human freedom and divine sovereignty remain central to Christian theology.

In conclusion, Semi-Pelagianism represents a significant theological position in the history of the Church, attempting to balance the role of human free will with the necessity of divine grace. While it was ultimately rejected by the Church as compromising the doctrine of grace and seen as heresy, the debates it sparked have shaped the development of Christian theology and continue to influence discussions about the nature of salvation, free will, and the sovereignty of God.

Related Videos